The state of fish stocks in the world’s oceans is worse than previously thought, according to a new study by Australian researchers. Overfishing has long been attributed to fishing policies that set catch limits higher than scientific recommendations, but even those recommendations were found to be too optimistic. This has led to more global fish stocks being overfished or collapsed than previously estimated.

Dr. Rainer Froese from GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and Dr. Daniel Pauly from the University of British Columbia have provided insights on the study. They call for simpler and more accurate models for stock assessments and urge for a more conservative approach when uncertainty arises.

The study analyzed data from 230 fish stocks worldwide and found that stock assessments have often been overly optimistic. This has resulted in stocks being classified as recovered when they were actually still declining. The research also revealed that a significant number of stocks categorized as “maximally sustainably fished” have actually crossed into the “overfished” category.

The authors note that the complexity of current stock assessment models, with over 40 parameters, contributes to these distortions. They recommend simpler models based on ecological principles and emphasize the use of the precautionary principle to protect stocks. The key principles for sustainable fishing include allowing fish to reproduce before catching, using environmentally friendly fishing gear, and establishing protected zones. By implementing these principles, the authors believe that sustainable fishing practices can be achieved.



Source